Judgments

8,966 judgments

All courts

Explore judgments from all courts. Explore all courts →

Recent judgments

Provisional relief denied; Court has jurisdiction over staff dispute and damages, African Charter claims against the institution inadmissible.
Administrative law – Interim/provisional measures – urgency, irreparable harm, prima facie case – Staff disputes – Jurisdiction under Article 9(1)(f) and (g) of the ECOWAS Court Protocol – exhaustion of internal remedies inapplicable where no effective remedy exists – African Charter claims inadmissible against ECOWAS institutions – admissibility of employment and damages claims.
10 December 2025
Revision dismissed for lack of newly discovered decisive facts; Court affirmed jurisdiction but found the application inadmissible.
Revision of judgments – Article 25 Protocol and Articles 92–93 Rules – requirement of newly discovered decisive fact unknown to Court and party – distinction between revision and appeal – inadmissibility where application seeks to re‑argue evidence and law – costs: each party bears own costs.
19 November 2025
Court upheld ECOWAS' lawful requirement that military staff resign before conversion and dismissed applicant's salary claims.
Administrative law — ECOWAS staff disputes — jurisdiction and admissibility — inoperative internal remedies — conversion of contract to permanent staff — eligibility of military personnel — requirement to resign — non-binding nature of Council recommendations — exclusivity of service — suspension of salary for unauthorized assumption of national office.
19 November 2025
State's six‑year failure to reconstitute NHRC council violated the Applicant's Article 7(1)(d) right to a hearing within a reasonable time.
Human rights — Right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time (Article 7(1)(d) African Charter) — Application against State for NHRC's prolonged failure to determine complaint — Quasi‑judicial bodies covered by Article 7 — State responsibility for dissolution/non‑reconstitution of adjudicatory organ — Reparations: general damages and ordering determination of pending complaint.
17 November 2025
Mandatory death sentence and prolonged detention on death row constitute torture; failure to provide prison medical care violates right to health.
Human rights — Death penalty — Mandatory death sentence and prolonged detention on death row may amount to torture/cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; Right to health — failure to provide adequate medical care to detained persons violates Article 16 of the African Charter; Evidence and fair trial claims — burden to prove trial in absentia and denial of counsel; Remedies — commutation/release, medical care and compensation.
10 November 2025
Court dismissed heirs' human-rights claim for lack of temporal jurisdiction; past discrete acts predated Court's mandate.
Human-rights jurisdiction — Temporal jurisdiction — Non-retroactivity of treaties — Events predating Court’s 2005 human-rights mandate — Continuing-violation doctrine inapplicable — Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
10 November 2025
Application struck out for failure to pursue proceedings and lack of instructions to counsel.
Procedural law – Striking out of applications – Rule 65(1)(b) and (c) Rules of Court – Applicant’s failure to pursue proceedings – Counsel unable to locate applicant – Restoration allowed on good cause.
9 October 2025
Plaintiff failed to prove title to customary family land; defendants’ ownership and possession upheld; claim dismissed.
Family/customary land – declaration of title – burden of proof on plaintiff; customary grants and gifts of family land; long possession as evidence of ownership; compensation for reclamation not establishing transfer absent family consent.
16 September 2025
Plaintiff failed to prove title; unchallenged evidence showed defendants’ family owned the land, so claim dismissed with costs.
Land law — Declaration of title — Burden of proof on plaintiff to establish ownership by clear and acceptable evidence — Family/customary grants and gifts of land — Long possession and unchallenged evidence amounting to admission — Reclamation for development requires proof of family consent.
16 September 2025
Court reopened pleadings and deemed respondent’s late submission on new electoral law properly filed in the interests of justice.
Procedure — Reopening pleadings — Rule 46(3) and 46(4) of the Rules — Inherent power under Rule 90 — Admission of late submissions — Consideration of newly enacted domestic legislation — Interests of justice — Precedent.
15 September 2025
Failure to call key eyewitnesses led to discharge for unlawful damage; accused convicted and sentenced for theft.
Criminal law – Unlawful damage (s.172(1)(b), Act 29) – Elements require intentional and unlawful damage – Burden of proof beyond reasonable doubt – Failure to call material eyewitnesses undermines prosecution case – Guilty plea simpliciter results in conviction and sentencing.
10 September 2025
Petitioner awarded 20% of matrimonial house; other property claims dismissed for lack of evidence.
Family law – Matrimonial property – Section 21(1) Matrimonial Causes Act – property completed during marriage treated as matrimonial asset; entitlement may arise absent direct documentary proof of contribution. Evidence – Burden to prove ownership or contribution – documentary proof required to establish claims to specific assets. Distribution – valuation and equitable share where construction completed in marriage (20% awarded).
19 August 2025
Court exercised discretion to reopen pleadings for additional electoral-law evidence and denied an extraordinary-session decision request.
Procedure — Reopening pleadings (Rule 46(3)) — Inherent powers of the Court (Rule 90) — Admission of additional evidence on subsequent electoral law changes — Interest of justice — Election-related human rights.
5 August 2025
Defendant’s admissions and failure to prove matrimonial interest entitled plaintiff to declaration, possession and injunction.
Land law – declaration of title and recovery of possession; interlocutory and perpetual injunctions; admissions in court as conclusive evidence; claim of matrimonial interest – burden to prove marriage and financial contribution; sufficiency of lease with schedules as evidence of title.
4 August 2025
Retention of goods by a defendant after his counter-offer is rejected may constitute acceptance of the plaintiff's original offer.
Contract law – Offer and counter-offer; counter-offer rejects original offer; acceptance by conduct (retention of goods); burden of proof on balance of probabilities; remedies – recovery of purchase price, interest, costs.
31 July 2025
Temporary assignment away from a station entitles an employee to out-of-station and night allowances under the CBA.
Labour law – Collective Bargaining Agreement – Out-of-station/night subsistence and accommodation; Distinction between a transfer and a temporary assignment for special duties; Entitlement to allowances where employee required to spend nights away from recognized station; Proof on balance of probabilities; Interest and costs awarded.
30 July 2025
Applicant’s dismissal held lawful; HR manual not contractual; applicant failed to prove unpaid allowances and bonuses.
Labour law – Termination of employment – Section 17 Labour Act (Act 651) – pay in lieu of notice; HR manual as policy not contract; unfair dismissal burden under Section 63(4); evidential burden for payment claims (bank statements, contract).
30 July 2025
Appellant’s defilement conviction set aside due to victim’s repudiation and insufficient corroboration of the prosecution’s case.
Criminal law – Defilement (s.101(2) Criminal Offences Act) – ingredients: victim’s age, carnal knowledge, identity. Evidence – appellate re-hearing – assessment of entire record where omnibus ground filed. Evidence – hostile/repudiating witness – effect of victim’s repudiation of earlier unsworn statements; need for corroboration. Confessions – caution/charge statements admissible but must be weighed with surrounding circumstances, including allegations of coercion. Medical evidence – probative value where timing not established and doctor not called.
30 July 2025
Divorce granted for irretrievable breakdown; house and vehicle held jointly acquired; alimony and respondent’s GHC60,000 claim dismissed.
Family law – Divorce – Irretrievable breakdown after diligent reconciliation efforts (s.2(1)(f) Act 367) – Financial provision – alimony refused for want of proof of means – Marital property – jointly acquired property doctrine; judicial sale and equal distribution – Burden of proof on pecuniary claim (GHC60,000) failed.
30 July 2025
Summary dismissal based on unproven allegations is wrongful; employer must prove misconduct before dismissal.
Employment law – Summary dismissal – Allegation of theft unproven; investigative committee report not determinative – Employer must prove misconduct before summary dismissal under collective agreement and Labour Act; Natural justice – query, response and disciplinary inquiry sufficient where collective agreement provides procedure; Remedies – reinstatement, back pay, damages and costs for wrongful dismissal.
30 July 2025
Employee failed to show unlawful dismissal; employer lawfully terminated contract by paying salary in lieu of notice.
Employment law – Termination of employment – Payment in lieu of notice; Compliance with express contract terms; Requirement for written notice in statute versus the parties’ contractual terms; Burden of proof in unfair dismissal claims.
30 July 2025
A plaintiff’s counter-offer is not blackmail; termination was unfair due to a biased procedure by the Head of School.
Labour law – unfair termination – Section 63(4) Labour Act – requirement to prove fair reason and fair procedure; impartiality in disciplinary/termination processes. Criminal law overlap – extortion/blackmail: negotiation and threat definitions; counter-offer and threat to litigate are not extortion. Evidence – civil standard of proof (preponderance) for unfair dismissal; higher standard if criminal allegation. Administrative law – bias and acting as judge in one’s own cause (Article 23).
30 July 2025
Plaintiff failed to prove unjustified assault; court found he initiated the brawl and dismissed claim with costs.
Assault and battery – burden and standard of proof – Evidence Act (NRCD 323) – necessity of corroboration – police report as evidence – brawl initiated by plaintiff – dismissal for failure to prove claim; costs awarded.
30 July 2025
Court adopts ADR settlement report filed 1 July 2025 as the consent judgment, disposing the criminal matter.
Criminal procedure — court-connected ADR — adoption of settlement report — consent judgment in magistrate’s court.
30 July 2025
A validly executed will is presumed; fraud requires proof beyond reasonable doubt and 2nd defendant intermeddled and must account.
Wills Act (Act 360) — formal requirements for validity — writing, testator signature/thumbprint and two attesting witnesses present at same time; sequence of signatures not material if single continuous transaction. Civil allegations of fraud/forgery in probate — once proponents establish prima facie due execution burden shifts to attackers; fraud allegation requires proof beyond reasonable doubt. Evidence — party alleging fraud must plead particulars and lead credible admissible evidence; blurred/indecisive expert comparison insufficient. Intermeddling/executor de son tort — taking possession or collecting rents without appointment exposes a person to liability to account and criminal summary penalties; admission to collecting rents establishes intermeddling and liability to account.
29 July 2025
Applicants’ Will upheld; respondents failed to prove forgery; one respondent ordered to account for rents and restrained from intermeddling.
Wills Act (Act 360) — Formal execution and attestation of wills; Burden of proof — proponent must show prima facie due execution; where fraud is alleged in civil proceedings the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt; Intermeddling/executor de son tort — taking possession or collecting rents triggers liability to account; Remedies — accounting, perpetual injunction, costs.
29 July 2025
The applicant, alleged illiterate, was held literate, bound by an amended lease and estopped from challenging the assignment.
Contract law – amendment of lease – presumption of literacy from documentary evidence; burden on alleged illiterate to rebut presumption. Illiterate Protection Act – requirements and limits; absence of jurat and failure to call corroborative witnesses. Unconscionable bargain – special disability; court will set aside only if dominant party cannot show fairness. Foreign‑currency pricing – compliance with Bank of Ghana directive and Foreign Exchange Act. Assignment of lease – effect of express assignment clause and estoppel by conduct/laches/acquiescence.
28 July 2025
Plaintiff proved repayment claim for retained Hajj-pilgrimage funds; defendants' unproven deductions and refund claims rejected.
Contract — payment for travel services — liability to refund where services not rendered and payments retained. Evidence — burden and standard in civil claims; documentary proof required to substantiate payments and refunds. Interest — award of pre-judgment interest where money is retained since a specified date. Damages — claim for general damages dismissed for lack of pleaded and evidential support. Costs — successful claimant awarded specified costs.
25 July 2025
Court granted special leave in a chieftaincy appeal despite procedural delay; dissent held time bar and refusal warranted.
Chieftaincy appeals; Article 131(4) Constitution; Article 131(2) special leave; Supreme Court Rules C.I.16 rr.7(1) & 30; time limits for leave to appeal; prima facie error; finality of chieftaincy disputes; key precedents Imbeah v Ababio, Afendza III, Dolphyne.
23 July 2025
A person with statutory chieftaincy rights must be heard before courts alter Register entries; failure warrants certiorari.
Chieftaincy law – National Register of Chiefs – alteration of entries – right to be heard before orders affecting statutory chieftaincy rights (s.57(5) Chieftaincy Act, 2008). Procedural fairness – audi alteram partem – personal nature of rights cannot be cured by hearing of related persons. Judicial review – certiorari – quashing of judgments made in absence of affected party; reliance on Ex parte Hawa Yakubu precedent. Civil Procedure – Order 55 High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (C.I.47) – notice and hearing requirements.
23 July 2025