|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| November 1989 |
|
|
A communication is inadmissible where the respondent State is not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights – Jurisdiction – Admissibility – Communication against a non-party State – Inadmissibility.
|
4 November 1989 |
|
A communication was declared inadmissible where the respondent State was not party to the African Charter.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights – admissibility – communication against non-party State – Commission lacks jurisdiction under Article 101 of Rules of Procedure.
|
4 November 1989 |
|
A communication is inadmissible if brought against a State that is not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.
International human rights law—jurisdiction—communications against non-party States—admissibility—African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
|
4 November 1989 |
|
A communication alleging rights violations was declared inadmissible as the respondent State was not a party to the Charter.
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights – jurisdiction – admissibility – complaint against a non-party State – communication declared inadmissible.
|
4 November 1989 |
|
A communication against non-party States to the Charter was declared inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction.
African Charter — Communications — jurisdiction — admissibility — State parties to Charter — communication against non-party State — inadmissible communication.
|
4 November 1989 |
| April 1989 |
|
|
A communication was declared inadmissible as the respondent state was not party to the African Charter.
African Charter – admissibility – communication against non-State Party – jurisdiction of Commission – Article 101 Rules of Procedure.
|
14 April 1989 |
