African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights - 2005

5 judgments
  • Filters
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
5 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
May 2005
Communication dismissed as inadmissible for failure to exhaust local remedies regarding alleged equality and defence rights violations.
Admissibility — Exhaustion of local remedies — Alleged violations of right to defence and equality under domestic law and African Charter — Unduly prolonged recourse exception.
11 May 2005
Commission closed the communication for lack of interest after the applicant failed to pursue or confirm withdrawal.
Human rights communications – prolonged detention allegations – admissibility – Article 56 (exhaustion of local remedies) – procedural non-cooperation and withdrawal – striking communications for lack of interest.
11 May 2005
A communication was declared inadmissible for using disparaging language and failing to exhaust local legal remedies.
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights – Admissibility – Insulting/disparaging language against State and institutions – Exhaustion of local remedies – Burden on complainant – Article 56(3) and 56(5).
11 May 2005
Allegations that Sharia criminal provisions violated fair trial, non‑discrimination and right to life; applicant withdrew, file closed.
Human rights — Sharia penal laws — Alleged violations of right to life, dignity and fair trial — Religious discrimination — Provisional measures/urgent appeals — Withdrawal of communication and closure of file.
11 May 2005
Swaziland’s concentration of all powers in the monarchy and bans on association and political parties violate multiple African Charter rights.
Constitutional law – Human rights – separation of powers – fair trial – freedom of association – freedom of assembly – political participation – obligations under the African Charter – judicial independence – constitutional reform.
11 May 2005