Revision dismissed for lack of newly discovered decisive facts; Court affirmed jurisdiction but found the application inadmissible.
Flynote
Revision of judgments – Article 25 Protocol and Articles 92–93 Rules – requirement of newly discovered decisive fact unknown to Court and party – distinction between revision and appeal – inadmissibility where application seeks to re‑argue evidence and law – costs: each party bears own costs.
Revision dismissed for lack of newly discovered decisive facts; Court affirmed jurisdiction but found the application inadmissible.
Flynote
Revision of judgments – Article 25 Protocol and Articles 92–93 Rules – requirement of newly discovered decisive fact unknown to Court and party – distinction between revision and appeal – inadmissibility where application seeks to re‑argue evidence and law – costs: each party bears own costs.
