Applicants lacked standing to sue on behalf of the deceased absent proof of relationship or legal mandate.
Flynote
Human rights jurisdiction — continuing state obligations — temporal jurisdiction; admissibility — victim status/standing under Article 10(d); not an invitation to exercise appellate jurisdiction over domestic courts; Article 9(3) limitation inapplicable to human rights cases.
Applicants lacked standing to sue on behalf of the deceased absent proof of relationship or legal mandate.
Flynote
Human rights jurisdiction — continuing state obligations — temporal jurisdiction; admissibility — victim status/standing under Article 10(d); not an invitation to exercise appellate jurisdiction over domestic courts; Article 9(3) limitation inapplicable to human rights cases.