Revision dismissed for failure to demonstrate a new, decisive fact as required by Article 27 of the Court’s Protocol.
Flynote
Revision of judgment – Article 27 Protocol – requirement of new and decisive fact – inadmissibility where issues previously raised – jurisdiction to hear revision – abuse of post-judgment procedure – costs awarded to respondent.
Revision dismissed for failure to demonstrate a new, decisive fact as required by Article 27 of the Court’s Protocol.
Flynote
Revision of judgment – Article 27 Protocol – requirement of new and decisive fact – inadmissibility where issues previously raised – jurisdiction to hear revision – abuse of post-judgment procedure – costs awarded to respondent.