Court found jurisdiction but dismissed application as inadmissible for lack of proper locus standi and mandate.
Flynote
Human rights jurisdiction — ECOWAS Court jurisdiction over alleged rights violations from domestic law application; admissibility — Article 10(d) Supplementary Protocol; actio popularis; corporate standing for freedom of expression claims; representative actions require mandate; broadcasting regulation v. freedom of expression.
Court found jurisdiction but dismissed application as inadmissible for lack of proper locus standi and mandate.
Flynote
Human rights jurisdiction — ECOWAS Court jurisdiction over alleged rights violations from domestic law application; admissibility — Article 10(d) Supplementary Protocol; actio popularis; corporate standing for freedom of expression claims; representative actions require mandate; broadcasting regulation v. freedom of expression.
